Showing posts with label Shaykh Ahmad Al-Najmi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shaykh Ahmad Al-Najmi. Show all posts

Tuesday, 19 July 2022

Modern Day Deviant Groups : Shaikh Ahmad bin Yahyaa An-Najmee


 Modern Day Deviant Groups : Shaikh Ahmad bin Yahyaa An-Najmee


Source: Al-Fataawaa al-Jaliyyah ‘anil-Manaahij Ad-Da’wiyyah (pg. 51-55)
Compiled by Hasan Ibn Mahmood Ibn Mansoor ad-Daghreeri.
Taken from Al-Ibaanah.com

Question: “Noble Shaikh Ahmad Ibn Yahyaa An-Najmee, may Allaah give you tawfeeq, there are found some books that include talk about these hizbee groups, which have incorporated a methodology that opposes the methodology of the Salaf in the fields of knowledge and action. And these books fall in between that which is large and difficult for the beginner to grasp of its content and between that which is short and contains little benefit. So O Shaikh, we hope that you can give us a clear but brief image of the most prominent of some of these methodologies’ founders and some of the issues they are criticized in. This is so that the Muslims can beware of falling into any part of that. And if you would be so kind O Shaikh as to direct the last of your talk to focusing on the true methodology, which every Muslim is obligated to follow…”

Answer: All praise be to Allaah, and may His peace and blessings be upon the most honorable of all creation, our prophet Muhammad, and on his family and Companions. To proceed:

Jamaa’at-ul-Ikhwaan al-Muslimoon

Definition of the Ikhwaan Al-Muslimoon:

They are the followers of Hasan Al-Bannaa. There are several points to be noted about their methodology, the most important of which are the following:

1. They show a lack of importance to Tawheed Al-‘Ibaadah [1], which is the most important matter in Islaam, since the Islaam of an individual is not valid without it.

2. They remain silent and concede to the people in their performance of major Shirk, supplication to other than Allaah, performance of tawaaf around graves, making oaths to the dead in the graves, sacrificing in their names and so on.

3. The founder of this methodology was a Sufi. He had a connection with Sufism to the point that he gave bay’ah (oath of allegiance) to ‘Abdul-Wahhaab Al-Khusaafee upon (following) his Khusaafee Shadh-lee order.

4. The presence of innovations amongst them and their worshipping Allaah through them – even to the point that the founder of this methodology acknowledged that the Prophet (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) would attend their gatherings of dhikr and that he (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) would forgive what past sins they had committed, as is found in his saying:

“May Allaah bless the one who upon light in which he appeared
To the worlds, and so he surpassed the sun and the moon
This habeeb (i.e. Muhammad) along with his beloved has gathered
And pardoned everyone in what sins they did in the past.”

5. They call to establishing the Khilaafah and this is an innovation because the Messengers and their followers were not entrusted with anything except to call to Tawheed. Allaah says: “And We have indeed sent to every nation a messenger, (saying to his people): ‘Worship Allaah and avoid the taaghoot (false deities).’” [Surah An-Nahl: 36]

6. They have a lack of Walaa and Baraa (loyalty and disavowment) or a weak form of it. This is made clear in their call to bring closeness between the Sunnis and the Shee’ah. And their founder was quoted as saying: “We will cooperate with one another in what we agree on and pardon one another in what we disagree on.”

7. They hate and despise the people of Tawheed and those who adhere to the Salafee Way. This is made clear in their talk concerning the Saudi state, which is founded upon Tawheed and which teaches Tawheed in its schools, institutes and universities. And it was made clear in their killing of Jameel Ar-Rahmaan Al-Afghaanee just because he called to Tawheed and because he had schools in which he would teach Tawheed.

8. They pursue the mistakes of the leaders and expose their faults – whether true or false – spreading them amongst the youth in order to make the leaders appear hateful to them and so that they can fill their hearts with contempt against them.

9. They hold detestable partisanship to the party they ascribe themselves to. So they show friendship based on this party and they show enmity based on this party.

10. They give their oath of allegiance to work for the Ikhwaani Manhaj according to the ten conditions that the founder has set forth. And there are other issues of concern, which perhaps can be dealt with at a later time.

The Qutubees

They are a people that have read the books of Sayyid Qutb and accepted what is in them from truth and falsehood. So you will find them defending Sayyid Qutb when someone criticizes him, even if the truth is with the one criticizing.

It is well known that Sayyid Qutb was not from the men of religious knowledge. His original status was that he was an author. Then he adopted the beliefs of the Ash’arees – the belief of ta’weel (misinterpretation of Allaah’s Attributes), as did others among the learned people from Egypt. He has serious and vile errors, which the people of knowledge have refuted and exposed. But when they expose these errors, this results in the rage of the Qutubees befalling them by way of their criticizing, speaking ill and discrediting them. So Allaah is sufficient for us and He is the Best of Guardians.

So the basic principle is that: Men are known by way of the Haqq (truth) and the Haqq is not known by way of men. So it is obligatory on us to accept the truth and to worship Allaah, Lord of all worlds, by it, and to abandon everyone that treads an innovated methodology. And we must place as our role model, the Messenger of Allaah (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam), his Khulafaa, his Companions, and those who followed them amongst the Imaams of guidance. And Allaah is the One who grants success.

The Suroorees

The definition of the people who adhere and ascribe to this methodology:

The Suroorees are a group of people or a sect that ascribe themselves to Muhammad Suroor Zayn-ul-‘Aabideen. They have some aspects of the Sunnah and some aspects of Bid’ah (innovation) in them. The most important characteristics that can be noted from them are:

1. They attack the rulers and speak about them in a manner that results in evil, corruption and danger. It appears that they declare the leaders to be disbelievers, but this can only be understood by way of their circumstances and actions and cannot be picked up from their words. This is since the path they take is the path of the Khawaarij or close to it, knowing that the religious texts state the obligation of hearing and obeying the rulers.

And our rulers in this land (of Saudi Arabia) are Muslims – all praise be to Allaah. They use Allaah’s Legislation for judging in their court systems and they establish the prescribed punishments (hudood). So declaring them to be disbelievers or talking about them in a manner that leads to revolting and rebelling against them is considered a great form of causing corruption. Due to this, we must warn against those who adhere to this methodology or rid ourselves from them, especially since they have attacked the scholars of this land by reviling them, making slanderous remarks against them and accusing them of betraying the Deen. This matter indicates what they are behind.

2. They call to Jihaad, but they do not intend by it the Jihaad against the disbelievers. Rather it seems like they intend by it to change the leaders, knowing that we cannot rid the leaders of their errors. And we do not claim that they are infallible however we say: It is obligatory to obey them and to advise them in a private manner because they are Muslims. And the Prophet (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) forbade us from rebelling against the leader unless the one rebelling sees clear disbelief upon him by which he will have a proof from Allaah in the matter.

3. They claim that the scholars in this land do not understand the current affairs. And they can be refuted by the fact that the Muftees and the judges do not issue a fatwa in a single issue nor do they judge in a single matter except after coming to know its state of affairs, which encompasses it, such as the cause, the conditions for the ruling and its effects. So whoever claims that these scholars and judges do not understand the current affairs then he has wronged himself and spoken what is not permissible for him to say. As for knowing the plans and schemes of the enemies and so on, then this falls under the jurisdiction of each country’s army.

Jamaa’at-ut-Tableegh

They are a people that follow Muhammad Ilyaas, the founder of this Jamaa’ah.

A biography of the founder: Muhammad Ilyaas was born in 1302H. He memorized the Qur’aan and read the Six Collections of Hadeeth. [2] He was upon the Deobandi methodology, taking the Hanafee madh-hab, the Ash’aree and Matureedee Creed and the Sufi way. They have four Sufi orders amongst them:

1. The Naqshabandees
2. The Sahroordees
3. The Qaadirees, and
4. The Jishtees

Shaikh Muhammad Ilyaas gave the Sufi bay’ah (oath of allegiance) to Shaikh Rasheed Al-Kankoohee, who later became Shaikh Rasheed As-Saharanpuree. Then he renewed it with Shaikh Ahmad As-Saharanpuree who certified him to take oaths of allegiance. Muhammad Ilyaas would sit in detached isolation (khalwah) by the grave of Shaikh Nur Muhammad Al-Badaayunee, in what is known as the Jishtee Muraaqabah (self meditation). And he would go out to the grave of ‘Abdul-Qudoos Al-Kankoohee, the one who forced the ideology of wahdat-ul-wujood [3] on him. He resided and taught in Delhi and passed away in 1363H.

Circumstances that brought about the start of the movement:

Shaikh Abul-Hasan An-Nadwee saw that Muhammad Ilyaas took refuge in this way of giving Da’wah when the ways of blind-following failed to rectify the people of his region. Shaikh Miyaan Muhammad Aslam quotes one of Ilyaas’ sayings that he received kashf (mystic disclosure) to follow this way through a dream in which he was inspired with a new tafseer (interpretation) of Allaah’s saying: “You were the best nation brought out for mankind, commanding good and forbidding evil and believing in Allaah.” [Surah Aali ‘Imraan: 110] And it was that going out (khurooj) to call people to the way of Allaah cannot be realized by staying in one place based on Allaah’s word “brought out” and that one’s Eemaan increases by going out in this khurooj based on Allaah’s saying: “and believing in Allaah” after having said: “brought out for mankind.”

The following can be noted from what has just been mentioned:

1. The Qur’aan is not interpreted by makshoofaat (mystical disclosures), and by Sufi dreams, of which the majority of them, rather all of them come from the inspirations of the Devil.

2. It is apparent from what was stated previously that the founder of this Jamaa’ah was engrossed in Sufism from head to toe. This is because he gave two oaths of allegiance on it and was tested by its false beliefs and because he would spend his time sitting by the graves of Sufis.

3. The founder of this Jamaa’ah was a qubooree (grave worshipper) and a khuraafee. This is clear from his saying: “…and he would sit in detached isolation (khalwah) by the grave of Shaikh Nur Muhammad Al-Badaayunee.” And concerning the second person, he mentioned that he forced the ideology of wahdat-ul-wujood on him. So his being attached to the grave of the one who forced the ideology of wahdat-ul-wujood on him is without doubt a clear proof that he held that same belief

4. Those who believe in wahdat-ul-wujood claim that Allaah embodies Himself inside the attractive woman – and refuge is sought from Allaah! This is a matter that has reached the highest level of repulsiveness. May Allaah give them what they deserve of His curses and wrath!

The methodology of the Jamaa’at-ut-Tableegh can be summarized in six issues or six principles or six characteristics:

1. Actualizing the statement of Tawheed: “Laa Ilaaha Illaallaah Muhammadur Rasoolullaah” (There is no deity worthy of worship except Allaah and Muhammad is His Messenger)
2. Praying with full submissiveness and humility
3. Knowledge of the Virtues (Fadaa’il) and not the Fiqh issues (Masaa’il) along with knowledge of dhikr
4. Showing generosity to the Muslim
5. Correcting the intention
6. Calling to Allaah (i.e. Da’wah) and going out (i.e. khurooj) for that purpose in the Way of Allaah upon the tablighi manhaj.

There is an objective behind each of these six principles or characteristics as well as a virtue to be attained. So for example the objective behind (Laa Ilaaha IllaAllaah) is to: “Eradicate the corrupted yaqeen (Certainty) from the heart while placing the correct and valid yaqeen into the Essence (dhaat) of Allaah.” They really intend the belief of wahdat-ul-wujood with this.

Point to be noted about Jamaa’at-ut-Tableegh:

1. The founder of this Jamaa’ah was raised upon Sufism and gave two oaths of allegiance on it.

2. He would position himself by graves, waiting to receive Kashf (Sufi mystical disclosure) and meditative ideas from the deceased inside them.

3. He would perform the Jishtee Muraaqabah (self meditation) at the gravesite of ‘Abdul-Quddoos Al-Kankoohee, who used to believe in wahadat-ul-wujood.

4. The Jishtee Muraaqabah is to sit by a grave for half an hour of every week, covering the face and reciting this dhikr: “Allaahu Haadiree, Allaahu Naadhiree.” [4] This statement or this action if done sincerely for Allaah is an innovation. And if it is done for the person in the grave then it is committing Shirk with Allaah. And the last of the two is what is most evident.

5. They have four of their graves located in the masjid from where their Da’wah emerged.

6. The founder of this Jamaa’ah believed in Kashf.

7. The founder of this Jamaa’ah was a grave worshipper.

8. The Tablighis perform their worship with an innovated form of dhikr, done in the way of the Sufis. This is by splitting up the statement of Tawhheed (Laa Ilaaha IllaAllaah).

9. Whoever cuts off the negation part of the Statement of Tawheed from its affirmation part intentionally, by saying “Laa Ilaaha” (only), then this necessitates the fact that he has committed disbelief. Shaikh Hamood At-Tuwayjiree stated this, quoting it from the scholars.

10. They make it permissible to wear amulets that have on them mystical writings and names of unknown people, which probably are names of devils! And this is not permissible.

Footnotes:

[1] Translator’s Note: This is the category of Tawheed related to the Oneness of Allaah in the worship that is performed to Him, i.e. that we worship only Allaah and no one else.

[2] Translator’s Note: The hadeeth Collections of Al-Bukhaaree, Muslim, Abu Dawood, At-Tirmidhee, Ibn Maajah and Ahmad.

[3] Translator’s Note: Wahdatul-Wujood is the belief that Creator (Allaah) and the Creation is one existence.

[4] Translator’s Note: This has something with the meaning of “Allaah is my ever-Present Accompanier, Allaah is my Watcher”

Friday, 20 November 2015

The one who expresses to the people that he is upon Sunnah but in fact he is not

                        

The one who expresses to the people that

 he is upon Sunnah but in fact he is not

Shaikh Ahmad al-Najmy رحمه الله said:

❝As for the one who expresses to the people that he is upon Sunnah and (that he is upon) Salafiyyah while in reality he is an innovator, no doubt Allaah عز وجل will indeed expose what he is hiding as long as he remains in that vile state.❞

 [al-Fataawa al-Jaliyyah (1/31)]

Monday, 30 December 2013

Being preoccupied with criticizing groups and neglecting knowledge

 
Being preoccupied with criticizing groups and neglecting knowledge

Old books <3
 
The noble Shaykh Ahmad bin Yahyaa An-Najmee rahimahul-llaah was asked:

Some junior students of knowledge have busied themselves with speaking about people of partisanship [hizbiyyoon]. They spent most of their times in that and they have neglected seeking the knowledge which will benefit them before their Lord, and will distinguish to them the pure from the evil, so that they know the errors of people of partisanship [hizbiyyoon]. Matter of fact, their prime concern is “what is your opinion about so and so” and most of their sittings are dominated by that, to the extent they would accuse others wantonly. So what is your advice and encouragement to those youth to have interest in legal knowledge that will immune them from innovations?
And he replied:
Frankly, it is incumbent not to be excessive in these matters in a way that takes the student of knowledge out of the realm of truth into disputation and wasting time on speech that brings no benefit, rather man keeps going in closed circles. The seeker of knowledge must utilize his time in the obedience of his Lord, and in seeking knowledge and attending study circles. There is no harm if he listens to warning against them (1) and clarifying their characteristics so that he takes his precaution from them. As if we spend all of our times speaking about them and we do not seek the knowledge which benefits us, without a doubt that is a huge and great mistake.
Source: Al-Fataawaa Al-Jaliyyah p27-28
And Shaykh Muqbel bin Haadee Al-Waadi’ee rahimahul-llaah was asked:
It is noticed on some of whom ascribe to Salafiyyah being preoccupied with criticism warning against groups while neglecting seeking knowledge. And others became preoccupied with seeking knowledge and abandoned warning so much so until they said: criticism is not from the methodology of Ahlus-Sunnah. So what is the plausible in this matter?
And he replied:
Those who are preoccupied with criticism and warning are considered neglectful in seeking knowledge and neglectful in criticism. If you look in the biography of Ibn Abee Haatim you will find that he is a major Haafith, in fact he was given the title Shaykhul-Islam, and likewise is Imaam Al-Bukhaaree, Imaam Ahmad bin Hanbal, Yahyaa bin Ma’een, Yahyaa bin Sa’eed Al-Qattaan, Abu Haatim, Abu Zur’ah, Ad-Daaraqutnee, Ibn Hebbaan and Al-Haakim. They have authored beneficial authorship in Tafseer and hadeeth, and they have preserved for us the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allaah peace is upon him and his household. And they have authored beneficial books in Jarh wat-Ta’deel, so this must be combined with that, otherwise the person will be neglectful and deficient.
And I ask you,
By which scale you weigh people if you are ignorant of beneficial knowledge, would you weigh them by desire or by what Shaykh Fulaan said to you? If the Shaykh retracted you retract and if he attacks a group you attack them. This [knowledge] must be combined with that [criticism and warning].
In my opinion, the other party that is preoccupied with knowledge and did not pay attention to Ta’deel is better than the former party, because the former party is handling something that it is not within its capability. However, this party [those who seek knowledge and reject Jarh] has abolished a vital aspect.
[Until he said]
And whoever discourages from Jarh wat-Ta’deel, he is discouraging from the Sunnah. If there is no Jarh wat-Ta’deel, the speech of the caller to Allaah will be like the speech of Alee At-Tantaawee or Muhammad Al-Ghazaalee or Hassan At-Turaabee or Ash-Sha’raawee.
Source: Fadhaa’ih wa NaSaa’ih p111-116 with abridgement.
Arabic text:
الاشتغال بنقد الفرق الضالة والتفريط في طلب العلم-من فتاوى العلّامتين النّجمي والوادعي رحمهما الله
سُئَلَ الشّيخُ العلّامة أحمد بن يحيى النَّجْمي رحمه الله: بعض طلبة العلم الصّغار أشْغلوا أنفسهم بالكلام عن الحزبيّين، وجعلوا في ذلك جُلّ أوقاتهم، وضيّعوا طلب العلم الذي بنفعهم عند ربّهم، ويُبي!ن لهم الخبيث من الطّيب؛ حتّى يعرفوا ما عند الحزبيّين من أخطاء. بل ما أصبح همُّهم إلّا ما رأيك في فلان وما رأيك في فلان، وأصبحتْ غالب جلساتهم في هذا الشّأن، حتّى أنّهم يتّهمون النّاس جزافا. فما هي نصيحتك لهؤلاء الشّباب وحثَّهم على الاهتمام بالعلم الشّرعي الذي يُحصّنهم من البدع؟
فأجاب رحمه الله: الحقيقة أنّ المبالغة في مثل هذه الأمور التي تخرُج بطالب العلم عن نطاق الحقّ إلى الجدل وتضييع الوقت في الكلام الذي لا تنتُج منه فائدة، بل يكون الإنسان يدور في حلقة مُفرّغة. فهذا لا ينبغي، بل يجب على طالب العلم أن يستغلّ وقته في طاعة الله سبحانه وتعالى، وفي البحث عن العلم وحضور الحلقات، ولا بأس أن يسمع التّحذير منهم وبيان صفاتهم حتّى يحذرهم. أمّا لو أنّنا جعلنا كلّ أوقاتنا في الكلام فيهم، ولا نشتغل بطلب العلم الذي ينفعنا، فهذا لا شكّ أنّه خطأ كبير وخطأ عظيم.
المصدر: الفتاوى الجليّة ص 27-28
وسُئِل الشّيخُ الإمام مقبل بن هادي الوادعيّ رحمه الله: يُلاحظ على بعض من ينتسب إلى السّلفيّة الاشتغال بالنّقد والتّحذير من الفرق وإهمال طلب العلم، وآخر اهتمّ بالعلم وترك التّحذير حتّى وصل بهم الأمر أنّهم قالوا: إنّ النّقد ليس من منهج أهل السّنّة في شيء، فما الصّواب في ذلك؟
فأجاب رحمه الله: هؤلاء الّذين يشتغلون بالنّقد والتّحذير يُعتبرون مُفرّطين في طلب العلم ومُفرّطين في شأن النّقد، فَعُلماؤنا إذا نظرْتَ في ترجمة ابن أبي حاتم وجدْتَه حافظا كبيرا بل لُقِّب بشيخ الإسلام وهكذا الإمام البخاري، والإمام أحمد بن حنبل ويحيى بن معين ويحيى بن سعيد القطّان وأبو حاتم وأبو زرعة والدّارَقُطني وابن حَبّان والحاكم، فقد أخرجوا المُؤلّفات النّافعة في علم التّفسير وعلم الحديث، وألّفوا الكتب النّافعة وحفِظوا لنا سنّة رسول الله صلّى الله عليه وسلّم. وأخْرَجوا الكتب النّافعة في الجرح والتّعديل، فلا بُدّ من الجمع بين هذا وهذا وإلّا كان الشّخص ناقِصاً ومُفرِّطا. وأنا أسألُك بأيّ ميزان تَزِنُ النّاس إذا كنت جاهلا بالعلم النّافع، أتَزِنُهم بالهوى أم بما قال لك الشّيخ فلان؟ فإذا تراجعَ الشّيخ فلان تراجَعْتَ وإذا حَمَلَ على طائفة حَمَلْتَ عليها، فلا بُدّ م الجمع بين هذا وهذا.
والطّرف الآخر الّذين يهتمّون بالعلم ولا يرفعون رأسا في التّعديل، فهذا الطّرف في نظري أحسنُ من الطّرف الأوّل، لأنّ الطّرف الأوّل يَتَصدّى لِما ليس من شأنه أن يتصدّى له، لكنّ هذا الطّرف هدمَ جانِبا مُهِمّا. (إلى أن قال) فالّذي يُزَهِّدُ في الجرح والتّعديل فَهُو يُزهِّد في السّنّة، فإذا لم يكن هناك جرح وتعديل فإنّ كلام الدّاعي إلى الله العالمِ الفاضل مثلُ كلام علي الطنطاوي أو مثل، أو مثل كلام محمد الغزالي، أو مثل كلام حسن التُّرابي أو مثل كلام الشّعراوي.
المصدر: فضائح ونصائح ص 111-116 باختصار.
Footnotes:
1-It said in the footnotes on this fatwa: this [i.e. warning] refers to people of knowledge who know the deviance that people of innovations are upon.

And Allaah knows best.

Friday, 9 November 2012

The ruling on saying ”shukran” to the one who rendered goodness to a person



The ruling on saying ”shukran” to the
one who rendered goodness to a person

Question: What is the ruling on saying “shukran” to the one who rendered goodness to a person?

Answer: Whoever did that has abandoned that which is more superior, which is the saying, “JazaakAllaahu khayran” (may Allaah reward you with good). And in Allaah lies success.


[Shaykh Ahmad bin Yahyaa an-Najmee|Fath Rabbil-Wadood Fil-Fataawaa war-Rasaa'il war-Rudood 1/68, no. 30|Translated by Abu `Iyaad Amjad Rafiq]


Thursday, 2 August 2012

The mother is the first school...



an-Najmî: "The mother is the first school. If she is righteous, the progeny becomes righteous." (Fath-ur-Rabb al-Wadûd (2/256))

Monday, 2 April 2012

Treating Parents harshly is not a Solution

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم 
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته

Treating Parents harshly is not a Solution

Question: Some young people think that treating their parents with a degree of harshness gets rid of many evils; what is the ruling on this?

Shaykh Ahmad Al-Najmi: I say that this is a mistaken view; Allah subhanhu wa ta’ala ordered His worshippers to treat their parents well, “Say not to them a word of disrespect (uff), nor shout at or harass them.”

Harshness through words is a kind of harassment and shouting or even worse, and if the harshness occurs through actions it can even lead to hitting.

Whoever thinks that he can forbid his parents from doing evil by being harsh to them has imagined wrongly because Allah subhanahu wa ta’ala said, “But if they strive to make you join in worship with Me others of which you have no knowledge, then obey them not; but behave kindly towards them in this worldly life.”

Here Allah didn’t command a person to be harsh to his parents.

Also, harshness is not a way of stopping all people from doing evil.

People have different dispositions, and some are only spurred on further by harsh treatment.

It therefore becomes clear that harshness does not bring about any good; the Prophet sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam said, “Gentleness does not touch anything except that it beautifies it, and harshness does not touch anything except that it spoils it.”

This person should then fear Allah and address his parents gently, kindly and mercifully.

Doing so, he would be deemed obedient to Allah, kind to his parents and disallowing evil to the best of his ability, and Allah did not burden people except with what is in their ability.

I think that this type of person (who tries to disallow his parents’ evils by being harsh to them) is like none other than those who want to reject evil by revolting against the Muslim ruler and shedding blood.

This person’s attitude is wrong, because his harshness against his parents is a greater evil than the one he wants to criticize.

And Allah is the One who grants success. [Fat-h Al-Rabb Al-Wadud fi Al-Fatawa wa Al-Rasa`il wa Al-Rudud #612]

[Translated by Abu Abdillah (Abu Zaynab) Owais Al-Hashimi]