Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen thought most likely to be
correct, as he said in al-Sharh al-Mumti’, 1/495): “The fuqaha’ (may Allaah have
mercy on them) likened (pig-related) impurity to dog-related impurity, because
pigs are dirtier than dogs, so the ruling should apply even more so.
This is a weak analogy, because pigs are mentioned in
the Qur’aan and they existed at the time of the Prophet (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him), and there is no report which likens them to dogs. So the
correct view is that pig-related impurity is like any other kind of impurity,
and there is no need to wash seven times, one of which should be with dust or
dirt.”
الشيخ ابن عثيمين رحمه الله ، حيث قال في
الشرح الممتع (1/495) : ( والفقهاء رحمهم الله ألحقوا نجاسته بنجاسة الكلب لأنه
أخبث من الكلب ، فيكون أولى بالحكم منه .
وهذا قياس ضعيف ؛ لأن الخنزير مذكور في
القرآن ، وموجود في عهد النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم ، ولم يرد إلحاقه بالكلب .
فالصحيح أن نجاسته كنجاسة غيره ، فتغسل كما تغسل بقية النجاسات ) انتهى
.
Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him)
said: “This is a weak analogy, because pigs are mentioned in the Qur’aan and
they existed at the time of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon
him), and there is no report which likens them to dogs. So the correct view is
that pig-related impurity is like any other kind of impurity, and there is no
need to wash seven times, one of which should be with dust or dirt.” Al-Sharh
al-Mumti’, 1/356.
الشيخ ابن عثيمين رحمه الله : ( وهذا قياس
ضعيف ؛ لأن الخنزير مذكور في القرآن ، وموجود في عهد النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم ،
ولم يرد إلحاقه بالكلب ، فالصحيح أن نجاسته كنجاسة غيره ، لا يغسل سبع مرات إحداها
بالتراب ) الشرح الممتع 1/356
No comments:
Post a Comment